NextMindOS
Pilot pricingPricing

Build responsible AI capability across your team.

Choose self-serve practice, team rollout, or a focused sprint that turns one workflow into evidence leadership can trust.

Solo practice

Personal

For solo operators who want a guided way to use AI at work without building bad habits.

€50per month
  • AI Tutor for guided practice
  • All 12 AI literacy modules
  • Spaced reviews for learned topics
  • Workplace prompts and retrieval drills
  • Progress and confidence tracking
Team rolloutMost teams

Team

For teams that need shared practice, governance basics, and evidence managers can review.

€50per seat/month
  • Everything in Personal
  • Role-based paths for each seat
  • Governance basics and risk-decision practice
  • Shared evidence summaries and decision log
  • Team-wide spaced review
  • Email + Slack support within 1 business day
4-week pilotPilot

AI Sprint

A four-week pilot for one delivery team: map real workflows, run experiments, and leave with evidence.

Custompilot scope
  • Map one high-value workflow end to end
  • Discover AI use cases across roles
  • Assess skill gaps by role and risk
  • Review governance posture and policy fit
  • Run 2–3 workflow experiments side by side
  • Week-4 leadership evidence report
  • Two workshops plus weekly reviews
Enterprise control

Enterprise

For multi-team rollouts that need governance alignment, security review, and a reporting cadence.

Contact usannual contract
  • Multi-team rollout model
  • SSO, audit log, EU data residency on request
  • Custom evidence schema and reporting cadence
  • Dedicated adoption lead and procurement support
  • Policy onboarding workshop

Early pricing is shown for planning. Final scope is confirmed in a short call.

Europe-first positioning

Built for responsible AI adoption in Europe.

Make AI literacy visible without pretending to sell certification: map risks, decisions, and evidence European teams can review.

What it is

Evidence of practice, not a compliance product.

NextMindOS supports AI literacy, governance readiness, and responsible workflow evidence — designed for teams that want to make their AI use visible, safer, and defensible.

  • Role-based AI literacy practice
  • Workflow-level risk decisions, logged
  • Leadership-ready evidence report
  • Prepares teams for responsible AI expectations in Europe
What it is not

What we won’t pretend to be.

We avoid presenting NextMindOS as anything it isn’t. The product is honest about its boundaries.

  • Not a legal compliance guarantee
  • Not an EU AI Act certification platform
  • Not employee surveillance
  • Not a generic AI training course
  • Not a prompt library
NextMindOS supports AI literacy, governance readiness, and responsible workflow evidence. It is not a substitute for legal advice or a guarantee of regulatory compliance.
How the learning works

Built around evidence-informed learning methods.

People don’t learn safe AI use by reading prompts. They improve when practice starts from real work, returns later, and proves transfer.

Option A

Technique effect sizes

A compact bar chart for showing which methods have the strongest meta-analytic support.

Meta-analytic effect sizes for learning techniquesHorizontal bars compare standardized effects for distributed practice, practice testing, retrieval versus reading, feedback, worked examples, rereading, and underlining.0.00.20.40.60.81.0Distributed practice0.85Practice testing0.74Retrieval vs reading0.50Feedback0.48Worked examples0.48Rereading0.47Underlining0.44

Data: Donoghue & Hattie 2021; Rowland 2014; Wisniewski et al. 2020; Barbieri et al. 2023. Values are standardized effects, not ROI forecasts.

Option B

Retrieval and spacing intervals

A forest-plot style view for separating strong effects from findings that are basically flat.

Confidence intervals for retrieval and spacing effectsA forest plot shows retrieval practice and spaced retrieval effects above zero, while expanding versus uniform spacing is close to zero.-0.200.51.0Spaced retrieval vs massedg=0.74Retrieval vs all controlsg=0.61Testing vs restudyg=0.50Expanding vs uniformg=0.03standardized mean difference (g)

Data: Rowland 2014; Adesope et al. 2017; Latimier, Peyre & Ramus 2021. Intervals shown where reported in the source synthesis.

Option C

Feedback quality curve

A line chart for explaining why feedback must name the mistake and the next move.

Feedback effect increases with information contentThe graph shows reinforcement or punishment at 0.24, corrective feedback at 0.46, and high-information feedback at 0.99.0.00.20.40.60.81.01.20.24Low info0.46Corrective0.99High infomore useful information in the feedback → larger observed effect

Data: Wisniewski, Zierer & Hattie 2020. High-information feedback includes task, process, and self-regulation information.

Attempt first

Start with the user’s own answer so gaps are visible before AI helps.

Retrieval practice

Ask people to recall and decide, not just reread instructions.

Spaced review

Bring topics back later so the skill survives beyond the workshop.

Specific feedback

Name the exact mistake and point to the next better attempt.

Fading scaffolds

Use examples and hints early, then remove support as skill grows.

Transfer tasks

Finish with a real workflow artifact managers can review.

Compare plans

What’s in each plan.

See where each plan adds team evidence, governance support, reporting, and hands-on rollout help.

AI Tutor (personal practice)
Spaced review of learned topics
12-module AI literacy path
Role-based literacy tracking
Shared evidence summaries
Risk-decision practice + logBasicsFullFullFull
Workflow experiments (side-by-side)1 / quarter2–3 in sprintCustom
Leadership-ready evidence reportQuarterlySprint deliverableCustom cadence
Governance readiness reviewSelf-serveHands-onHands-on
SSO, audit log, EU data residencyOn request
Onboarding workshop
Support response SLAEmail1 business dayDedicated leadDedicated lead
Who needs to care

Different buyers. One evidence layer.

Each stakeholder gets a clearer answer: where AI helps, where it is risky, and what changed after practice.

Managing directors & COOs

Productivity, client trust, and risk visibility — without slowing delivery.

Heads of delivery

Workflow-level adoption your delivery leads can actually defend in reviews.

HR / L&D & digital transformation

Role-based AI literacy with evidence — not generic compliance training.

CTO / CIO / security / Datenschutz

Visibility into shadow AI, tool approval, and decision logs by policy version.

Start small

Begin with one team and one workflow.

Start with the readiness assessment, pick one workflow, then scope the smallest pilot that can produce evidence.